For example, Paul Jennings Hill used to argue as follows:
- Murderers should be executed.
- Abortionists are murderers.
- Therefore, abortionists should be executed.
Do you agree with Chomsky? Is it logically inconsistent to be pro-life and then argue that abortion is murder, and that abortion providers should be executed? If so, is there any way opponents of abortion can make sense of this inconsistency?