Levine concludes that "the very idea of a Jewish state is undemocratic, a violation of the self-determination rights of its non-Jewish citizens, and therefore morally problematic." According to the UN's Covenant on Civil and Political Rights:
All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.If Levine is right, then does that mean that peoples can exercise their right to self-determination only if it does not infringe on other peoples' right to self-determination? If so, does that seem like a reasonable restriction on rights? [Compare Article 4 of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (1789): "Liberty consists in the freedom to do everything which injures no one else; hence the exercise of the natural rights of each man has no limits except those which assure to the other members of the society the enjoyment of the same rights."]
No comments:
Post a Comment
This is an academic blog about critical thinking, logic, and philosophy. So please refrain from making insulting, disparaging, and otherwise inappropriate comments. Also, if I publish your comment, that does not mean I agree with it. Thanks for reading and commenting on my blog.